WASHINGTON
Former President Donald Trump has ordered the United States to withdraw from 66 international organizations and agreements, marking one of the most extensive pullbacks from global institutions in U.S. history and signaling a renewed push toward an “America First” foreign policy.
The decision was finalized through a presidential memorandum signed this week, directing federal agencies to begin formal withdrawal procedures from a wide range of international bodies. According to administration officials, the move is aimed at reducing U.S. financial commitments abroad and ending participation in organizations viewed as misaligned with American interests and sovereignty.
Of the 66 organizations identified, 31 are linked to the United Nations, while the remaining 35 operate independently. The withdrawals include several well-known climate, development, and humanitarian institutions, such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, UN Women, the UN Population Fund, and the International Renewable Energy Agency. The United States is also ending its involvement in the International Solar Alliance.
White House officials said many of these organizations have become ineffective, overly political, or financially burdensome, arguing that U.S. taxpayers should not fund programs that do not directly benefit the country. Senior administration sources emphasized that the decision reflects a broader effort to prioritize bilateral diplomacy over multilateral commitments.
The move echoes actions taken during Trump’s first term, when the U.S. withdrew from the Paris climate agreement, the World Health Organization, and the UN Human Rights Council. However, analysts note that the current decision is far broader in scope and could have longer-lasting consequences for America’s role in global governance.
International reaction has been swift, with several allies expressing concern that the withdrawals could weaken global cooperation on climate change, public health, and development. UN officials warned that the loss of U.S. funding and participation may strain already stretched programs and reduce international coordination.
Climate experts, in particular, cautioned that stepping away from scientific and policy-focused bodies could limit data sharing and reduce U.S. influence in shaping global standards. Some diplomats also warned that the vacuum left by the U.S. could be filled by rival powers seeking greater influence.
Under the memorandum, withdrawal timelines will vary depending on each organization’s legal framework. Some exits will take effect quickly, while others may take months or longer. While Congress is not required to approve many of the withdrawals, lawmakers could attempt to challenge or reverse certain decisions through legislation.
The decision underscores a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy and is expected to remain a point of debate as withdrawal processes move forward.
Discover More RFK Jr. Unveils New Federal Nutrient-Dense Food Guidelines
Discover more from VyvyDaily
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
